The following article, Springfield Mayor Picks a Fight with MAGA, was first published on The Black Sphere.
Springfield OH Mayor Rob Rue should rejoice at the notoriety of his city, despite some negativity. As the saying goes, “All news is good news”.
What an opportunity for such a small town, as towns like this rarely get the nation’s attention unless a white cop kills a Black man. In this case, for the most part only people’s pets are in serious danger.
Springfield finds itself in the news because of its mayor. Mayor Rue is a RINO who brought this negativity on himself. Rue allowed an invasion of illegals, no doubt enticed by funds promised by Biden, and the consequences fall squarely on his shoulders.
But he’s now added insult to injury.
According to Rue, a visit by President Trump to his city would be a “strain”. So he commented that he doesn’t want the president in Springfield.
“It would be an extreme strain on our resources. So it’d be fine with me if they decided not to make that visit. It would be very difficult.”
Rue repeated this multiple times during his interview.
Springfield, Ohio Mayor, RINO Rob Rue, doesn’t want President Trump coming to Springfield for any reason.
“It would be an extreme strain on our resources. So it’d be fine with me if they decided not to make that visit. It would be very difficult.”
Trump can’t visit for 2… pic.twitter.com/Efe081IpN3
— ProudArmyBrat (@leslibless) September 18, 2024
What true Republican wouldn’t want Trump to visit. The next president of the United States would be able to help alleviate the problem, especially Trump. He’s a deal-maker and problem-solver.
The issue at hand highlights the stark contrast between two different scenarios that impact a city’s economy in vastly different ways.
On one side, a large rally drawing tens of thousands of newcomers to a city like Springfield could potentially be a boon to the local economy. The influx of 50,000 people staying in hotels, dining at restaurants, shopping at convenience stores, and generally engaging with the city’s businesses could easily inject millions of dollars into the local economy. If each visitor spends just $100 during their stay, that’s an immediate $5 million boost to Springfield’s economy, spread across local establishments that thrive on tourism and short-term surges in demand.
Contrast a Trump rally with the challenges of absorbing a large number of refugees or migrants—such as the estimated 20,000 Haitians who have been sent to Springfield.
Unlike a rally where people voluntarily visit, spend money, and leave, the arrival of thousands of refugees requires long-term, often costly, support from local resources. The federal government may provide initial financial aid, but these costs are drawn from taxpayer money, placing an indirect burden on the citizens of Springfield and other parts of the country.
In the long term, the costs of supporting these refugees outweighs the initial influx of federal assistance. Many of the new arrivals may not have immediate job prospects. And given their background, they will see America’s welfare system as easy pickings. Eventually, far too many will ultimately rely on social services, including housing assistance, healthcare, and education for their children. The strain on these systems can be substantial, especially in areas like healthcare and schooling, where local infrastructure is forced to stretch its limits to accommodate the sudden population surge. Moreover, the city is often unprepared to handle such an influx, leading to overcrowded shelters, overwhelmed public services, and a growing demand for subsidized housing.
As these individuals settle in and start families, the cost burden only increases. Their children will require access to public education, healthcare, and, over time, other social services. The economic burden on Springfield’s infrastructure multiplies. While there is always hope that refugees will integrate into society, find employment, and contribute to the local economy, the reality is often more complex. Some may struggle to find work, exacerbating issues of dependency on public assistance.
Additionally, some individuals may unfortunately figure out how to “game the system.”
This isn’t an indictment of all refugees, as the Left would like to portray. The statement represents a realistic acknowledgement that the system can be manipulated by those who understand how to exploit loopholes. I know this happens, because I have family members who do this.
Adding to the complexity is the political landscape.
The mayor of Springfield, who campaigned as a Republican, is revealed to have donated to Democrats. This political inconsistency raises questions about where the mayor’s true loyalties lie and whether his policies truly align with the conservative principles he espoused during his campaign. For local residents, this may signal a disconnect between the mayor’s public stance and his private actions, leaving them to wonder whether he will prioritize the needs of long-standing citizens over the influx of refugees. Or will he cave to Leftist special interest?
Trump’s presence will highlight just how bad things have gotten in Springfield. For any future president a visit like this should be par for the course. For far too long we’ve allowed politicians to stay inside the DC beltway and legislate from the ivory tower. Force Harris to see the destruction her policies have created.
Continue reading Springfield Mayor Picks a Fight with MAGA …