The following article, Kamala’s Comeback? More Like a Rerun Nobody Asked For, was first published on The Black Sphere.

Let’s talk about Kamala Harris—you know, the woman whose political relevance has the same shelf life as a TikTok trend involving cottage cheese and jalapeños.

She’s back. Sort of. Like a bad sequel, or a reboot nobody asked for, Kamala is once again making the talk show rounds to convince America that she’s still a thing.

And where better to launch her “resurgence” tour than the flaming dumpster that is The Late Show with Stephen Colbert? A show whose ratings are sinking faster than Kamala’s approval in the black community during her campaign. Remember: Kamala is black…at least on alternate Tuesdays.

Colbert, bless his smug little heart, decided to resurrect Kamala’s career like she’s some kind of political Lazarus. Except instead of rising from the dead, she just kind of twitched on the table and farted out another series of incoherent word salads.

Now let’s remember—this woman got wrecked by Trump last November. And this whoopin’ led to a spiritual beatdown.

After the election, Kamala went off to “soul search,” which in politician-speak means focus-grouped herself into oblivion and realized California didn’t even want her as governor. The land of rolling blackouts and legalized shoplifting took a hard pass on Madam Cackle.

So instead of retiring to a life of writing bad poetry and giving TED Talks to empty rooms, Kamala’s now peddling a book. Because nothing screams “I still matter” like trying to hawk your memoirs on a dying talk show. The only thing missing was a segment called “Who Dis?” so the audience could be reminded who she is.

But wait—it gets better. The Democrats, in a fit of collective psychosis, are now floating her name for 2028. Yeah. They’re saying Kamala might take another crack at the presidency. When I read that, I was so glad I wasn’t drinking milk, because I would’ve blown it out of my nose and into orbit.

Kamala Harris… president? That’s like trying to reboot Windows 95 on a MacBook Air—it’s a fundamentally stupid idea.

Let’s not forget how she did in 2020. She didn’t just lose; she got humiliated.

She dropped out before Iowa, people. Iowa. That’s like getting cut from a reality show in the trailer.

And in her Colbert interview, when asked the most basic softball question—“Who’s leading the Democratic Party?”—Kamala gave the kind of answer that makes you check your own carbon monoxide detector.

Her response: “The party has many leaders.”

What? Is that a Magic 8 Ball answer? “Reply hazy, try again”? C’mon. It’s not like the Democrats are exactly overflowing with leadership. Half the party’s either on trial, under investigation, or eligible for senior discounts at Golden Corral.

I understand her political expediency and the want to be deferential to the other lunatics in her party. But she has proved to be just another tool of the political machine with her answer.

She should have said something like,

“Well, we had a changing of the guard. And although I lost to President Trump, I feel like I would have done much better in a longer cycle. I take it as my responsibility to continue representing the [idiotic] views of my party, and being the leader. That doesn’t dismiss the hard work of others, but my presidential run proved a lot, as did my time as VP.”

Her diplomatic answer shows exactly why she shouldn’t be in power. Now, imagine if Trump got asked that question. “Who’s the leader of the Republican Party?”

“Me. Obviously. Next question. Maybe a better one this time.”

Boom. Done. No equivocation or worrying about the feelings of other Republicans.

Even when the Left tried to cheat him out of 2020, Trump never stepped aside. He remained the de facto leader, took the slings, the arrows, the indictments, and still came back swinging like a political Mike Tyson in his prime.

Kamala? She’s over here dodging basic questions like she’s in a spelling bee with no vowels.

If Democrats really want Harris to run, it must be on a bet. No serious Democrat could possibly want her as a candidate for anything ever again. She had one job: stop Trump.

She and Biden held the White House, and thus access to all the same minions who cheated them into office in the first place, and she blew it.

So no, Kamala Harris isn’t in a resurgence. She’s in reruns. She’s like that TV show you vaguely remember from the early 2000s that’s somehow still playing at 2 a.m. on some cable channel no one watches. Familiar face, same bad writing, and absolutely no ratings.

But hey, if the Democrats really want to run her again in 2028, I say: do it. Please. Because watching Kamala Harris try to lead is the best campaign ad Republicans could ever ask for.

Continue reading Kamala’s Comeback? More Like a Rerun Nobody Asked For